Home  ›  How Long Does a Work of Art Remain in the Public Domain

How Long Does a Work of Art Remain in the Public Domain

Written By Thursday, 5 May 2022 Add Comment Edit

Works exterior the scope of copyright police

Public domain logo from the Creative Commons Corporation

The public domain consists of all the creative work to which no exclusive intellectual holding rights utilize. Those rights may accept expired,[i] been forfeited,[ii] expressly waived, or may be extraneous.[3]

Equally examples, the works of William Shakespeare, Ludwig van Beethoven, Leonardo da Vinci and Georges Méliès are in the public domain either by virtue of their having been created earlier copyright existed, or by their copyright term having expired.[ane] Some works are not covered by a country'southward copyright laws, and are therefore in the public domain; for case, in the U.s., items excluded from copyright include the formulae of Newtonian physics, cooking recipes,[4] and all computer software created before 1974.[five] Other works are actively dedicated by their authors to the public domain (run into waiver); examples include reference implementations of cryptographic algorithms,[half-dozen] [7] [8] and the image-processing software ImageJ (created by the National Institutes of Wellness).[9] The term public domain is not normally applied to situations where the creator of a work retains balance rights, in which instance use of the work is referred to as "under license" or "with permission".

Equally rights vary by land and jurisdiction, a work may be bailiwick to rights in one country and exist in the public domain in some other. Some rights depend on registrations on a state-by-state ground, and the absence of registration in a detail country, if required, gives ascent to public-domain status for a piece of work in that state. The term public domain may also exist interchangeably used with other imprecise or undefined terms such as the public sphere or commons, including concepts such as the "commons of the mind", the "intellectual eatables", and the "information commons".[x]

History

Although the term domain did not come into use until the mid-18th century, the concept tin can be traced back to the ancient Roman law, "as a preset system included in the belongings right system".[11] The Romans had a big proprietary rights system where they defined "many things that cannot be privately owned"[11] as res nullius, res communes, res publicae and res universitatis.[12] The term res nullius was defined as things non still appropriated.[13] The term res communes was defined as "things that could be ordinarily enjoyed by mankind, such equally air, sunlight and ocean."[11] The term res publicae referred to things that were shared by all citizens, and the term res universitatis meant things that were owned by the municipalities of Rome.[xi] When looking at it from a historical perspective, 1 could say the construction of the idea of "public domain" sprouted from the concepts of res communes, res publicae, and res universitatis in early Roman law.[11]

When the first early copyright law was originally established in Uk with the Statute of Anne in 1710, public domain did not appear. However, similar concepts were adult by British and French jurists in the 18th century. Instead of "public domain", they used terms such as publici juris or propriété publique to depict works that were non covered past copyright law.[fourteen]

The phrase "fall in the public domain" can exist traced to mid-19th-century France to draw the end of copyright term. The French poet Alfred de Vigny equated the expiration of copyright with a work falling "into the sink hole of public domain"[xv] and if the public domain receives any attention from intellectual property lawyers information technology is still treated as piddling more than that which is left when intellectual property rights, such every bit copyright, patents, and trademarks, expire or are abandoned.[10] In this historical context Paul Torremans describes copyright as a, "petty coral reef of individual right bulging upwardly from the ocean of the public domain."[xvi] Copyright law differs by country, and the American legal scholar Pamela Samuelson has described the public domain as being "different sizes at different times in different countries".[17]

Definition

Newton'due south own copy of his Principia, with hand-written corrections for the 2nd edition

Definitions of the boundaries of the public domain in relation to copyright, or intellectual belongings more mostly, regard the public domain as a negative space; that is, it consists of works that are no longer in copyright term or were never protected past copyright law.[18] According to James Boyle this definition underlines common usage of the term public domain and equates the public domain to public property and works in copyright to private property. However, the usage of the term public domain can exist more granular, including for example uses of works in copyright permitted past copyright exceptions. Such a definition regards work in copyright as private property bailiwick to fair-use rights and limitation on ownership.[1] A conceptual definition comes from Lange, who focused on what the public domain should exist: "it should be a place of sanctuary for individual artistic expression, a sanctuary conferring affirmative protection against the forces of individual cribbing that threatened such expression".[18] Patterson and Lindberg described the public domain non every bit a "territory", but rather every bit a concept: "[T]here are certain materials – the air nosotros exhale, sunlight, rain, infinite, life, creations, thoughts, feelings, ideas, words, numbers – not subject area to individual buying. The materials that etch our cultural heritage must be free for all living to employ no less than thing necessary for biological survival."[19] The term public domain may also be interchangeably used with other imprecise or undefined terms such equally the public sphere or commons, including concepts such equally the "commons of the listen", the "intellectual eatables", and the "data commons".[10]

Public domain by medium

Books

A public-domain book is a book with no copyright, a book that was created without a license, or a volume where its copyrights expired[20] or take been forfeited[ clarification needed ].[21]

In most countries the term of protection of copyright expires on the beginning day of January, seventy years afterward the death of the latest living writer. The longest copyright term is in Mexico, which has life plus 100 years for all deaths since July 1928.

A notable exception is the United States, where every volume and tale published before 1927 is in the public domain; American copyrights terminal for 95 years for books originally published between 1927 and 1978 if the copyright was properly registered and maintained.[22]

For instance: the works of Jane Austen, Lewis Carroll, Machado de Assis, Olavo Bilac and Edgar Allan Poe are in the public domain worldwide equally they all died over 100 years ago.

Project Gutenberg, the Internet Archive and Wikisource make tens of thousands of public domain books available online every bit ebooks.

Music

People accept been creating music for millennia. The starting time musical notation system, the Music of Mesopotamia system, was created four,000 years agone. Guido of Arezzo introduced Latin musical notation in the tenth century.[23] This laid the foundation for the preservation of global music in the public domain, a distinction formalized aslope copyright systems in the 17th century. Musicians copyrighted their publications of musical note every bit literary writings, only performing copyrighted pieces and creating derivative works were not restricted past early copyright laws. Copying was widespread, in compliance with the law, but expansions of those laws intended to do good literary works and responding to commercial music recording technology's reproducibility have led to stricter rules. Relatively recently, a normative view that copying in music is not desirable and lazy has become popular among professional musicians.

The states copyright laws distinguish between musical compositions and sound recordings, the one-time of which refers to melody, notation or lyrics created past a composer or lyricist, including sheet music, and the latter referring to a recording performed by an creative person, including a CD, LP, or digital sound file.[24] Musical compositions autumn under the same full general rules as other works, and anything published before 1925 is considered public domain. Sound recordings, on the other mitt, are subject field to different rules and are non eligible for public domain status until 2021–2067, depending on the engagement and location of publishing, unless explicitly released beforehand.[25]

The Musopen projection records music in the public domain for the purposes of making the music available to the full general public in a loftier-quality audio format. Online musical archives preserve collections of classical music recorded by Musopen and offering them for download/distribution as a public service.

Films

A public-domain film is a film that was never nether copyright, was released to public domain past its writer or has had its copyright expired. In 2016, there were more than 2,000 films in the public domain from every genre, including musicals, romance, horror, noir, westerns, and animated films.[ citation needed ]

Value

Pamela Samuelson has identified viii "values" that can arise from information and works in the public domain.[27]

Possible values include:

  1. Edifice blocks for the creation of new cognition, examples include data, facts, ideas, theories, and scientific principle.
  2. Access to cultural heritage through information resources such as aboriginal Greek texts and Mozart'southward symphonies.
  3. Promoting education, through the spread of information, ideas, and scientific principles.
  4. Enabling follow-on innovation, through for example expired patents and copyright.
  5. Enabling low cost access to information without the need to locate the owner or negotiate rights clearance and pay royalties, through for instance expired copyrighted works or patents, and not-original information compilation.[28]
  6. Promoting public health and safety, through information and scientific principles.
  7. Promoting the democratic process and values, through news, laws, regulation, and judicial opinion.
  8. Enabling competitive imitation, through for case expired patents and copyright, or publicly disclosed technologies that exercise not qualify for patent protection.[27] : 22

Human relationship with derivative works

Derivative works include translations, musical arrangements, and dramatizations of a work, besides every bit other forms of transformation or adaptation.[29] Copyrighted works may not be used for derivative works without permission from the copyright owner,[30] while public domain works tin can exist freely used for derivative works without permission.[31] [32] Artworks that are public domain may as well be reproduced photographically or artistically or used equally the footing of new, interpretive works.[33] Works derived from public domain works can exist copyrighted.[34]

One time works enter into the public domain, derivative works such as adaptations in volume and film may increase noticeably, every bit happened with Frances Hodgson Burnett'due south novel The Secret Garden, which became public domain in the US in 1977 and most of the residue of the world in 1995.[35] By 1999, the plays of Shakespeare, all public domain, had been used in more than 420 feature-length films.[36] In addition to straightforward adaptation, they have been used as the launching signal for transformative retellings such every bit Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Troma Amusement'south Tromeo and Juliet.[37] [38] [39] Marcel Duchamp'southward Fifty.H.O.O.Q. is a derivative of Leonardo da Vinci'due south Mona Lisa, one of thousands of derivative works based on the public domain painting.[31] The 2018 film A Star is Born is a remake of the 1937 picture of the same name, which is in the public domain due to an unrenewed copyright.[xl]

Perpetual copyright

Some works may never fully lapse into the public domain. A perpetual crown copyright is held for the Authorized Male monarch James Version of the Bible in the UK.[41]

While the copyright has expired for the Peter Pan works by J. M. Barrie (the play Peter Pan, or the Boy Who Wouldn't Abound Up and the novel Peter and Wendy) in the Uk, it was granted a special exception nether the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 (Schedule 6)[42] that requires royalties to be paid for commercial performances, publications and broadcasts of the story of Peter Pan inside the Britain, as long as Cracking Ormond Street Hospital (to whom Barrie gave the copyright) continues to exist.

In a paying public domain authorities, works that take entered the public domain afterward their copyright has expired, or traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions that have never been subject to copyright, are still subject to royalties payable to the state or to an authors' association. The user does not have to seek permission to copy, nowadays or perform the work, but does have to pay the fee. Typically the royalties are directed to support of living artists.[43]

Public domain mark

In 2010, The Creative Commons proposed the Public Domain Mark (PDM) as symbol to indicate that a work is free of known copyright restrictions and therefore in the public domain.[44] [45] The public domain marker is a combination of the copyright symbol, which acts every bit copyright discover, with the international 'no' symbol. The Europeana databases apply it, and for instance on the Wikimedia Commons in Feb 2016 2.9 million works (~10% of all works) are listed with the marking.[46]

Application to copyrightable works

Works not covered by copyright law

The underlying idea that is expressed or manifested in the creation of a work generally cannot be the subject of copyright law (meet idea–expression divide). Mathematical formulae volition therefore generally form office of the public domain, to the extent that their expression in the form of software is non covered past copyright.[ citation needed ]

Works created before the being of copyright and patent laws also form role of the public domain. For example, the Bible and the inventions of Archimedes are in the public domain. However, translations or new formulations of these works may be copyrighted in themselves.[ citation needed ]

Expiration of copyright

Determination of whether a copyright has expired depends on an exam of the copyright in its source state.

In the U.s.a., determining whether a work has entered the public domain or is still nether copyright tin exist quite complex, primarily because copyright terms have been extended multiple times and in different ways—shifting over the course of the 20th century from a fixed-term based on first publication, with a possible renewal term, to a term extending to 50, then lxx, years after the death of the author. The claim that "pre-1927 works are in the public domain" is correct only for published works; unpublished works are under federal copyright for at least the life of the author plus seventy years.

In almost other countries that are signatories to the Berne Convention, copyright term is based on the life of the writer, and extends to 50 or 70 years beyond the death of the author. (See List of countries' copyright lengths.)

Legal traditions differ on whether a piece of work in the public domain can have its copyright restored. In the European union, the Copyright Duration Directive was applied retroactively, restoring and extending the terms of copyright on material previously in the public domain. Term extensions past the US and Commonwealth of australia generally have non removed works from the public domain, but rather delayed the addition of works to it. Nevertheless, the United states moved away from that tradition with the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, which removed from the public domain many foreign-sourced works that had previously not been in copyright in the US for failure to comply with US-based formalities requirements. Consequently, in the Us, foreign-sourced works and US-sourced works are now treated differently, with strange-sourced works remaining nether copyright regardless of compliance with formalities, while domestically sourced works may be in the public domain if they failed to comply with and so-existing formalities requirements—a situation described equally odd by some scholars, and unfair past some United states of america-based rightsholders.[47]

The Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen, a High german fine art museum, brought a suit against Wikimedia Eatables in 2016 for photographs uploaded to the database depicting pieces of art in the museum. The museum claimed that the photos were taken by their staff, and that photography within the museum past visitors was prohibited. Therefore, photos taken by the museum, fifty-fifty of fabric that itself had fallen into the public domain, were protected by copyright law and would need to be removed from the Wikimedia image repository. The courtroom ruled that the photographs taken past the museum would be protected under the German Copyright Deed, stating that since the lensman needed to brand practical decisions about the photograph that information technology was protected material. The Wikimedia volunteer was ordered to remove the images from the site, as the museum'south policy had been violated when the photos were taken.[48]

Government works

Works of the United States Regime and various other governments are excluded from copyright law and may therefore be considered to be in the public domain in their respective countries.[49] They may also be in the public domain in other countries equally well. The legal scholar Melville Nimmer has written that "it is axiomatic that cloth in the public domain is not protected by copyright, even when incorporated into a copyrighted work".[50]

Dedicating works to the public domain

Release without copyright detect

Before 1988 in the US, works could be hands given into the public domain by just releasing it without an explicit copyright observe. With the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 (and the earlier Copyright Act of 1976, which went into effect in 1978), all works were by default copyright protected and needed to be actively given into public domain by a waiver statement/anti-copyright can telephone call notice.[51] [52] Not all legal systems take processes for reliably donating works to the public domain, e.g. ceremonious constabulary of continental Europe.[ citation needed ] This may even "effectively prohibit whatsoever attempt by copyright owners to surrender rights automatically conferred by constabulary, particularly moral rights".[53]

Public-domain-similar licenses

An alternative is for copyright holders to issue a license which irrevocably grants as many rights every bit possible to the general public. Real public domain makes licenses unnecessary, equally no owner/author is required to grant permission ("Permission civilization"). At that place are multiple licenses which aim to release works into the public domain. In 2000 the WTFPL was released as a public domain similar software license.[54] Creative Commons (created in 2002 past Lawrence Lessig, Hal Abelson, and Eric Eldred) has introduced several public-domain-like licenses, called Creative Commons licenses. These give authors of works (that would qualify for copyright) the ability to decide which protections they would like to place on their material. Every bit copyright is the default license for new fabric, Creative Commons licenses offering authors a variety of options to designate their work nether whichever license they wish, as long as this does not violate standing copyright law.[55] For instance, a CC By license allows for re-users to distribute, remix, adjust, and build upon material, while besides agreeing to provide attribution to the author in any of these cases.[56] In 2009 the Creative Eatables released the CC0, which was created for compatibility with law domains which accept no concept of dedicating into public domain. This is accomplished by a public domain waiver statement and a fallback all-permissive license, in case the waiver is not possible.[57] [58] Different in the Usa, where author's moral rights are not regulated, in countries where moral rights are protected past copyright law it is not possible to waive those rights, but only the rights related to the exploitation of the piece of work. Thereby, the terms of the CC0 license would disharmonism with many copyright laws. A solution to this upshot is to translate the license by setting "three different layers of activity. First, the right holder waives any copyright and related rights that can be waived in accordance with the applicable law. Secondly, if there are rights that the correct holder cannot waive under applicable law, they are licensed in a way that mirrors as closely equally possible the legal issue of a waiver. And finally, if there are whatever rights that the correct holders cannot waive or license, they affirm that they will not exercise them and they volition non assert any merits with respect to the use of the work, once over again within the limits of applicable constabulary. (...) In countries where moral rights exist just where they can be waived or not asserted, they are waived if asserted (e.thou. the Britain). In countries where they cannot be waived they volition remain into full consequence in accordance to the applicable law (think of France, Spain or Italy where moral rights cannot be waived)."[59] The same occurs in Switzerland.

The Unlicense, published effectually 2010, has a focus on an anti-copyright message. The Unlicense offers a public domain waiver text with a fallback public domain-similar license inspired by permissive licenses but without attribution.[threescore] [61] Some other option is the Cypher Clause BSD license, released in 2006 and aimed at software.[62]

In October 2014, the Open Noesis Foundation recommends the Creative Commons CC0 license to dedicate content to the public domain,[63] [64] and the Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL) for data.[65]

Patents

In most countries, the term of rights for patents is twenty years, later which the invention becomes part of the public domain. In the United States, the contents of patents are considered valid and enforceable for 20 years from the appointment of filing within the United States or 20 years from the primeval date of filing if nether 35 USC 120, 121, or 365(c).[66] However, the text and whatever illustration within a patent, provided the illustrations are substantially line drawings and exercise not in any substantive way reverberate the "personality" of the person drawing them, are not subject field to copyright protection.[67] This is separate from the patent rights just mentioned.

Trademarks

A trademark registration may remain in force indefinitely, or expire without specific regard to its historic period. For a trademark registration to remain valid, the owner must continue to use it. In some circumstances, such as decay, failure to assert trademark rights, or common usage by the public without regard for its intended use, it could go generic, and therefore part of the public domain.

Because trademarks are registered with governments, some countries or trademark registries may recognize a marking, while others may have determined that it is generic and not commanded as a trademark in that registry. For example, the drug acetylsalicylic acid (2-acetoxybenzoic acrid) is better known as aspirin in the U.s.a.—a generic term. In Canada, however, Aspirin, with an upper-case letter A, is still a trademark of the German company Bayer, while aspirin, with a lowercase "a", is non. Bayer lost the trademark in the Us, the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and France after Earth War I, every bit part of the Treaty of Versailles. And so many copycat products entered the marketplace during the war that it was deemed generic but three years later.[68]

Breezy uses of trademarks are not covered by trademark protection. For instance, Hormel, producer of the canned meat production Spam, does not object to informal use of the word "spam" in reference to unsolicited commercial e-mail.[69] Still, it has fought attempts by other companies to annals names including the word 'spam' as a trademark in relation to computer products, despite that Hormel's trademark is only registered in reference to food products (a trademark claim is made within a particular field). Such defences have failed in the United Kingdom.[lxx]

Public Domain Solar day

An English logo of the 2018/2019 Public Domain Day in Poland

Public Domain 24-hour interval is an observance of when copyrights expire and works enter into the public domain.[71] This legal transition of copyright works into the public domain usually happens every twelvemonth on 1 January based on the individual copyright laws of each country.[71]

Visual created for Public Domain Twenty-four hours. Features Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, equally information technology is famously office of the public domain

The observance of a "Public Domain 24-hour interval" was initially informal; the earliest known mention was in 2004 by Wallace McLean (a Canadian public domain activist),[72] with support for the thought echoed by Lawrence Lessig.[73] As of one January 2010[update] a Public Domain Twenty-four hours website lists the authors whose works are inbound the public domain.[74] There are activities in countries effectually the world by various organizations all under the banner Public Domain Day.

Encounter also

  • Public records
  • Center for the Study of the Public Domain
  • Copyfraud
  • Copyleft
  • Copyright status of works past the federal government of the United States
  • Copyright Term Extension Act
  • Eldred v. Ashcroft
  • Off-white dealing
  • Free-culture motion
  • Free software
  • Freedom of panorama
  • Limitations and exceptions to copyright
  • List of countries' copyright lengths
  • List of films in the public domain in the United states
  • Millar v Taylor
  • Orphan works
  • Paying public domain
  • Protection of Classics
  • Public Domain Enhancement Act
  • Public domain image resources
  • Public domain in the United States
  • Public domain software
  • Dominion of the shorter term

References

  1. ^ a b c Boyle, James (2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Listen. CSPD. p. 38. ISBN978-0-300-13740-8. Archived from the original on 14 February 2015.
  2. ^ Graber, Christoph B.; Nenova, Mira B. (2008). Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 173. ISBN978-1-84720-921-4. Archived from the original on 20 December 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  3. ^ unprotected Archived ii March 2016 at the Wayback Machine on bitlaw.com
  4. ^ Copyright Protection Not Available for Names, Titles, or Curt Phrases Archived v April 2016 at the Wayback Auto on copyright.gov "Listings of ingredients, every bit in recipes, labels, or formulas. When a recipe or formula is accompanied by an explanation or directions, the text directions may be copyrightable, but the recipe or formula itself remains uncopyrightable."
  5. ^ Lemley, Menell, Merges and Samuelson. Software and Internet Law, p. 34 "computer programs, to the extent that they embody an author'south original creation, are proper subject matter of copyright."
  6. ^ Snake - A Candidate Block Cipher for the Advanced Encryption Standard Archived xiii January 2013 at the Wayback Machine "Serpent is now completely in the public domain, and we impose no restrictions on its employ. This was appear on 21 August at the Starting time AES Candidate Briefing." (1999)
  7. ^ KeccakReferenceAndOptimized-3.two.zip mainReference.c "The Keccak sponge office, designed by Guido Bertoni, Joan, Michaël Peeters and Gilles Van Assche. For more data, feedback or questions, delight refer to our website: http://keccak.noekeon.org/Implementation [ permanent dead link ] by the designers, Herbert demoted as "the implementer". To the extent possible under law, the implementer has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to the source lawmaking in this file. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/nil/one.0/" Archived 26 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ^ skein_NIST_CD_121508.naught Archived 10 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine on skein-hash.info, skein.c "Implementation of the Skein hash function. Source lawmaking author: Doug Whiting, 2008. This algorithm and source code is released to the public domain."
  9. ^ disclaimer Archived 5 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine on rsb.info.nih.gov
  10. ^ a b c Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 103. ISBN978-i-84542-282-0. Archived from the original on 19 November 2011.
  11. ^ a b c d e Huang, H. (2009). "On public domain in copyright law". Frontiers of Law in China. 4 (2): 178–195. doi:10.1007/s11463-009-0011-vi. S2CID 153766621.
  12. ^ Foures-Diop, Anne-Sophie (2011). "Revue juridique de l'Ouest, 2011-1: Les choses communes (Première partie)". Revue Juridique de l'Ouest. Ecole de Avocats du Yard Quest de Rennes. 24 (1): 59–112. doi:10.3406/juro.2011.4336.
  13. ^ Rose, C Romans, Roads, and Romantic Creators: Traditions of Public Property in the Information Age (Winter 2003) Police force and Gimmicky Problems 89 at p.five, p.4
  14. ^ Torremans, Paul (2007). Copyright law: a handbook of gimmicky research. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 134–135. ISBN978-i-84542-487-9.
  15. ^ Torremans, Paul (2007). Copyright law: a handbook of contemporary enquiry. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 154. ISBN978-ane-84542-487-9.
  16. ^ Torremans, Paul (2007). Copyright police force: a handbook of contemporary research. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 137. ISBN978-ane-84542-487-9.
  17. ^ Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 102. ISBN978-i-84542-282-0. Archived from the original on 19 November 2011.
  18. ^ a b Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 104. ISBN978-one-84542-282-0. Archived from the original on 19 November 2011.
  19. ^ Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 105. ISBN978-1-84542-282-0. Archived from the original on 19 November 2011.
  20. ^ Boyle, James (1 January 2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind . Yale University Printing. ISBN9780300137408 . Retrieved 30 December 2016 – via Internet Archive. public domain.
  21. ^ Graber, Christoph Beat; Nenova, Mira Burri (ane January 2008). Intellectual Holding and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN9781848443914 . Retrieved thirty December 2016 – via Google Books.
  22. ^ "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States | Copyright Information Eye". copyright.cornell.edu . Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  23. ^ Otten, J. "The Catholic Encyclopedia". New Appearance. Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 6 Jan 2022.
  24. ^ "Copyright Registration of Musical Compositions and Sound Recordings" (PDF). United states Copyright Office. Retrieved fifteen October 2018.
  25. ^ "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the U.s.a.". Cornell Academy. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
  26. ^ Jenkins, Jennifer. "Public Domain Day 2021". Center for the Study of the Public Domain. Duke University School of Constabulary. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
  27. ^ a b Guibault, Lucy; Hugenholtz, Bernt (2006). The future of the public domain: identifying the commons in information law. Kluwer Police force International. ISBN978-9-0411-24357. Archived from the original on 18 December 2014.
  28. ^ Perry&Margoni (2010). "From music tracks to Google maps: who owns Estimator Generated Works?". Figurer Law and Security Review. SSRN 1647584.
  29. ^ Stern, Prof Richard H. (2001). "50.H.O.O.Q. Internet related Derivative Works". Supplemental fabric Computer Law 484. The George Washington University Police force School. Archived from the original on 19 Baronial 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  30. ^ Leaffer, Marshall A. (1995). Understanding copyright law. Legal text series; Contemporary Casebook Series (2nd ed.). K. Bender. p. 46. ISBN0-256-16448-seven.
  31. ^ a b Introduction to intellectual property: theory and practice. World Intellectual Property Organisation, Kluwer Law International. 1997. p. 313. ISBN978-90-411-0938-5. Archived from the original on half-dozen April 2015.
  32. ^ Fishman, Stephen (September 2008). The copyright handbook: what every author needs to know. Nolo. p. 178. ISBN978-1-4133-0893-8 . Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  33. ^ Fishman, Stephen (2008). Public domain: how to find and use copyright-free writings, music, fine art and more. Nolo. pp. 124–125. ISBN978-one-4133-0858-seven.
  34. ^ Public Domain Trouble Spots - Copyright Overview past Rich Stim - Stanford Copyright and Fair Employ Center Archived 18 May 2016 at the Wayback Auto. Section called "Public Domain Works That Are Modified".
  35. ^ Lundin, Anne H. (2 Baronial 2004). Amalgam the canon of children's literature: beyond library walls and ivory towers. Routledge. p. 138. ISBN978-0-8153-3841-3 . Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  36. ^ Immature, Mark (ed.). The Guinness Volume of Records 1999, Bantam Books, 358; Voigts-Virchow, Eckartm (2004), Janespotting and Beyond: British Heritage Retrovisions Since the Mid-1990s, Gunter Narr Verlag, 92.
  37. ^ Homan, Sidney (2004). Directing Shakespeare: a scholar onstage. Ohio University Press. p. 101. ISBN978-0-8214-1550-4 . Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  38. ^ Kossak, Saskia (2005). "Frame my face to all occasions": Shakespeare's Richard III on screen. Braumüller. p. 17. ISBN978-iii-7003-1492-9 . Retrieved one June 2010.
  39. ^ Cartmell, Deborah; Whelehan, Imelda (2007). The Cambridge companion to literature on screen. Cambridge Academy Printing. p. 69. ISBN978-0-521-61486-3 . Retrieved ane June 2010.
  40. ^ "Everything you demand to know about the 1937 version of 'A Star Is Born'". Amusement Weekly . Retrieved 12 August 2020.
  41. ^ Metzger, Bruce M. (2006). The Oxford companion to the Bible. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Printing. pp. 618. ISBN978-0-1950-46458.
  42. ^ "Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48)". Office of Public Sector Information. 1988. p. 28. Archived from the original on 1 June 2008. Retrieved two September 2008.
  43. ^ WIPO Secretariat (24 November 2010), Notation on the Meanings of the Term "Public Domain" in the Intellectual Belongings System with special reference to the Protection of Traditional Noesis and Traditional Cultural Expressions/Expressions of Folklore, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Belongings and Genetic Resource, Traditional Cognition and Folklore: Seventeenth Session, retrieved 28 November 2018
  44. ^ "Creative Eatables announces the Public Domain Marker". The H Open. The H. 12 October 2010. Archived from the original on xvi October 2010. Retrieved 12 October 2010.
  45. ^ Peters, Diane (11 October 2010). "Improving Access to the Public Domain: the Public Domain Mark". Creative Commons. Archived from the original on xiv Oct 2010. Retrieved 12 October 2010.
  46. ^ Category:CC-PD-Marker Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Automobile in February 2016
  47. ^ Dennis Karjala, "Judicial Oversight of Copyright Legislation", 35 N. Ky. L. Rev. 253 (2008).
  48. ^ Stefan Michel, Digitisation of fine art in the public domain–museum urges Wikimedia to take down reproductions of out-of-protection artworks, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 14, Upshot 6, June 2019, Pages 427–429, doi:x.1093/jiplp/jpz042
  49. ^ Copyright Office Nuts Archived 25 February 2009 at the Wayback Car
  50. ^ Nimmer, Melville B., and David Nimmer (1997). Nimmer on Copyright, section thirteen.03(F)(4). Albany: Matthew Bender.
  51. ^ "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States". Archived from the original on 26 September 2010. Retrieved 30 December 2016.
  52. ^ Copyright Notice Archived 26 September 2012 at the Wayback Automobile, U.S. Copyright Office Circular 3, 2008.
  53. ^ "Nearly CC0 — "No Rights Reserved"". Artistic Commons. Archived from the original on 28 April 2013. Retrieved 23 Apr 2013.
  54. ^ Version 1.0 license on anonscm.debian.org
  55. ^ Boyle, J. (2008). A Creative Commons. In The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Heed (pp. 179-204). Yale University Press. Retrieved Nov xx, 2020, from http://world wide web.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npvzg.12
  56. ^ "Nearly CC Licenses". Creative Commons . Retrieved 23 November 2020.
  57. ^ "11/17: Lulan Artisans Textile Competition". 17 June 2009. Archived from the original on 31 December 2016. Retrieved 30 Dec 2016.
  58. ^ Validity of the Artistic Commons Zero 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication and its usability for bibliographic metadata from the perspective of German Copyright Law by Dr. Till Kreutzer, chaser-at-law in Berlin, Germany
  59. ^ Ignasi Labastida, Thomas Margoni; Licensing Off-white Data for Reuse. Information Intelligence 2020; 2 (one-two): 199–207. doi: https://doi.org/x.1162/dint_a_00042, p.203
  60. ^ The Unlicense: a License for No License Archived 24 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine on ostatic.com past Joe Brockmeier (2010)
  61. ^ The Unlicense Archived eight July 2018 at the Wayback Motorcar on unlicense.org
  62. ^ "BSD 0-Clause License (0BSD) Explained in Plain English". Retrieved 12 February 2020.
  63. ^ licenses on opendefinition.com
  64. ^ Creative Commons 4.0 By and By-SA licenses canonical conformant with the Open Definition by Timothy Vollmer on creativecommons.org (27 December 2013)
  65. ^ pddl on opendatacommons.org
  66. ^ Manual of Patent Examining Procedure available at "MPEP". Archived from the original on xviii Apr 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2015.
  67. ^ Officer, Office of the Principal Communications. "Terms of Use for USPTO Websites". Archived from the original on 25 September 2009. Retrieved 30 Dec 2016.
  68. ^ Aspirin Archived 24 August 2005 at the Wayback Machine, World of Molecules
  69. ^ "SPAM® Brand and the Internet". Hormel Foods. Archived from the original on 13 October 2009.
  70. ^ McCarthy, Kieren (31 January 2005). "Hormel Spam trademark example canned". Archived from the original on 7 July 2008. Retrieved 2 September 2008.
  71. ^ a b Richmond, Shane (ane January 2010). "Happy Public Domain 24-hour interval! Here's to many more – Telegraph Blogs". Blogs.telegraph.co.uk. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 24 December 2011.
  72. ^ McLean, Wallace J. (i January 2004). "Happy Public Domain Twenty-four hour period!". American University.
  73. ^ Lessig, Lawrence (1 January 2004). "Public domain day - in Canada (Lessig Web log)". Lessig.org. Archived from the original on 7 Nov 2011. Retrieved 25 Dec 2011.
  74. ^ Public Domain Twenty-four hour period 2010 Archived 14 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine at MetaFilter establishes the existence of the website at the time.

External links

  • Internet Annal
  • Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Knuckles University

durkinyazzle1943.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain#:~:text=Expiration%20of%20copyright,-Determination%20of%20whether&text=The%20claim%20that%20%22pre%2D1927,the%20author%20plus%2070%20years.

0 Response to "How Long Does a Work of Art Remain in the Public Domain"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel